Content Menu
● The Physical Reality of Bending
● Outside Setback (OSSB) vs Inside Setback (ISSB)
● The Relationship Between Setback, Bend Allowance, and Bend Deduction
● Impact of Material Properties on Setback
● Mathematical Deep Dive: Non-90 Degree Bends
● Tooling and the “Actual” Radius
● Practical Examples in Modern Industry
● Advanced Setback Considerations: Software and Automation
● Common Errors and How to Fix Them
● The Future of Setback Calculation
Before we dive into the math of setback, we need to acknowledge what is actually happening when a press brake forces a punch into a die. Metal does not just fold like paper. As the material bends, the outer surface is stretched (tension), and the inner surface is crushed (compression). Somewhere in the middle of the material thickness, there is a “neutral axis” that stays the same length.
This physical displacement means that a corner in sheet metal is never truly a sharp point. It is a curve. If you were to extend the straight edges of a bent part until they met at an imaginary point, that point is called the “mold point.” The distance from this imaginary sharp corner back to where the curve actually starts is what we call setback.
To visualize setback, you have to think like a layout artist. Imagine a piece of metal bent at 90 degrees. If you look at it from the side, you see two straight flanges connected by an arc. If you take a ruler and extend the outer line of one flange and the outer line of the other flange, they will intersect in space. This intersection is the mold point.
The spot where the straight part of the flange ends and the curve of the bend begins is known as the tangent point. Setback is simply the distance between that mold point and the tangent point. If you are working with a 90-degree bend, this calculation is straightforward, but as soon as you move into acute or obtuse angles, the geometry gets a bit more “fun.”
One of the biggest mistakes beginners make is assuming the bend radius is just a setting on the machine. In reality, the inside radius is a product of your tooling, your material thickness, and the material’s ductility. The setback is directly tied to this radius. If you increase your bend radius, your setback increases. If you use a thicker material, your setback increases.
This is why you can’t just use a “standard” setback for every job. A part made from 16-gauge cold-rolled steel with a 1/32-inch radius will have a vastly different setback than a 1/4-inch aluminum plate with a 1/4-inch radius. As an engineer, you have to account for these variables during the design phase to ensure the flat pattern is accurate.
In most manufacturing environments, when someone says “setback,” they are talking about Outside Setback (OSSB). However, for high-precision aerospace or medical applications, you might also need to deal with Inside Setback (ISSB). Understanding the difference is critical for clear communication between the design office and the shop floor.
The Outside Setback is the distance from the outside mold point to the outside tangent point. For a standard 90-degree bend, the formula is deceptively simple. You just add the inside radius ($R$) to the material thickness ($T$).
But wait—what happens when the bend isn’t 90 degrees? This is where trigonometry enters the chat. For any angle, the formula becomes:
In this equation, “$A$” represents the angle of the bend. Note that in sheet metal terminology, we often distinguish between the “included angle” and the “bent angle.” For the purposes of this formula, we are usually looking at the degree of the bend itself (e.g., a 45-degree bend).
Inside Setback (ISSB) is calculated from the inside mold point to the inside tangent point. It is less commonly used in general fabrication because most layout work focuses on the outer dimensions of a part. However, it follows a similar logic:
Notice that the thickness ($T$) is missing here because we are only dealing with the internal geometry. While OSSB helps you define the overall footprint of the part, ISSB is often used when designing internal components or bracing that must sit flush against the inside of a bend.
Let’s say you are manufacturing a simple L-bracket out of 0.125-inch thick aluminum. Your design calls for an inside bend radius of 0.125 inches. Since it’s a 90-degree bend, the math is easy:
This means that if your finished flange needs to be 2.0 inches long (measured from the outside corner), the straight portion of your flat sheet before the bend starts should be 1.750 inches (2.0 minus the 0.250 setback). If you forget to subtract the setback, your finished part will be exactly 0.250 inches too long. In the world of machining and assembly, a quarter-inch error is an absolute eternity.
To truly understand setback, you have to see where it fits in the “Grand Unified Theory” of sheet metal. You cannot talk about setback without also mentioning Bend Allowance (BA) and Bend Deduction (BD). These three values are the “Holy Trinity” of the flat pattern.
While setback tells you where the bend starts, Bend Allowance tells you how much material is actually in the bend. Remember that neutral axis we talked about earlier? The Bend Allowance is the length of the arc along that neutral axis.
The Bend Deduction is the value that most CNC laser and waterjet programmers care about. It is the total amount of material you subtract from the sum of your flange lengths to get your flat pattern length. The relationship is expressed as:
This formula is beautiful because it links the external geometry (setback) with the internal material physics (allowance). If you know your setback and you know your bend allowance, you can calculate your bend deduction with 100% certainty.
Imagine you have a piece of metal and you want to bend it into a “U” shape with three sides, each 100mm long. If you just cut a piece 300mm long and bend it, your final part will be significantly larger than 100mm per side. Why? Because the outside dimensions are measured to the mold points—points in space that don’t actually contain metal.
By calculating the OSSB for each of the two bends, you identify where the metal stops being a straight line. By calculating the BD, you find out exactly how much smaller than 300mm your starting sheet needs to be so that after the metal stretches and curves, the final outside dimensions are exactly 100mm.
One of the reasons manufacturing engineering is so complex is that metal isn’t a consistent, perfect substance. Different alloys behave differently under stress, which affects the “realized” radius and, consequently, the setback.
When you bend a piece of stainless steel versus a piece of soft copper, the way the molecules slide past each other varies. Stainless steel is much “springier.” Even if you use a 3mm punch, the metal might “spring back” slightly, resulting in a larger actual radius than intended. If the radius changes, your setback calculation must change too.
Furthermore, sheet metal has a “grain” created during the rolling process at the mill. Bending “with” the grain (parallel to the rolling direction) is easier but more prone to cracking and can result in a slightly different radius than bending “across” the grain. In high-precision aerospace components, engineers often specify the grain direction on the drawing because they know it will impact the setback and the overall dimensional accuracy of the part.
The K-factor is the ratio that represents the location of the neutral axis. While it is primarily used to calculate Bend Allowance, it indirectly affects how we perceive the accuracy of our setback calculations. If your K-factor is off, your Bend Allowance will be wrong, and your Bend Deduction won’t match your physical part, leading many to wrongly blame the setback calculation.
Most parts in the real world aren’t just simple 90-degree folds. Think about an octagonal enclosure or a tapered hopper. These require acute (less than 90) and obtuse (more than 90) bends.
An obtuse bend is one where the bend angle is greater than 90 degrees (meaning the part is “open”). For these, the setback is actually quite small. If you bend a piece of metal only 10 degrees, the mold point is very close to the tangent point. Using the formula $\tan(A / 2) \cdot (R + T)$, you will see that as the angle $A$ gets smaller, the tangent value approaches zero.
For example, on a 150-degree included angle (which is only a 30-degree bend), the $OSSB$ for 2mm material and a 2mm radius would be:
Acute bends (where the part is bent “closed” more than 90 degrees) are the most challenging. As the angle increases, the mold point moves further and further away from the part. If you were to bend a part 165 degrees (leaving only a 15-degree opening), the setback would be massive because the mold lines have to travel a long way before they intersect.
In these cases, the $OSSB$ calculation becomes vital because it often exceeds the length of the flange itself. If you don’t account for this, your CAD software might throw an error, or worse, your flat pattern will be physically impossible to manufacture.
As an engineer, you might specify a 0.5mm radius on your drawing. But in the shop, the operator might use a 6mm V-die. In air bending—the most common form of bending today—the inside radius of the part is not determined by the punch radius, but by the width of the die.
A common rule of thumb in the industry is that the realized inside radius in air bending is approximately 20% of the V-die opening for stainless steel, or 15% for cold-rolled steel and aluminum.
If you design a part with a setback based on a 1mm radius, but the shop uses a die that produces a 2.5mm radius, your setback calculation is now invalid. The physical tangent points will be further back than you planned, and the part will be out of tolerance. This highlights the need for a feedback loop between the engineering office and the shop floor. You must know what tooling is available before you finalize your setback and flat pattern calculations.
Let’s look at how setback influences specific sectors of manufacturing.
In aerospace, weight is everything. Components are often made from thin-gauge titanium or specialized aluminum alloys. Ducting for environmental control systems involves complex, multi-angled bends. Because these ducts must fit into extremely tight spaces alongside electrical looms and hydraulic lines, the tolerance is often +/- 0.1mm.
Engineers here don’t just use standard setback tables. They perform “bend tests” where they bend a sample piece of the specific lot of material, measure the setback and deduction, and then update their CAD global variables. This empirical approach ensures that when the final $50,000 duct is bent, the setback is perfectly accounted for.
Think about a server rack or a high-end audio amplifier chassis. These often feature “hems” (where the metal is folded back on itself) and tight internal mounting brackets. If the setback isn’t calculated correctly for the internal brackets, the PCB (Printed Circuit Board) won’t line up with the pre-cut holes in the chassis.
In this scenario, the Outside Setback is used to ensure the exterior looks seamless, while the Inside Setback is used to position the standoffs for the electronics. A mistake in the setback calculation here results in a “stack-up error” where small mistakes in each bend add up to a part that is completely unusable.
For a tractor or excavator cabin, the material is much thicker—often 6mm or 8mm steel. At this thickness, the setback becomes a significant physical dimension. A 90-degree bend in 8mm plate with an 8mm radius results in a 16mm setback. If a designer fails to account for 16mm at every corner, the cabin could easily end up 32mm wider than intended, making it impossible to mount to the chassis.
Most modern manufacturing engineers rely on 3D CAD software like SolidWorks, Autodesk Inventor, or specialized sheet metal software like TRUMPF’s Boost or Amada’s AP100. These programs have built-in calculators for setback.
The danger lies in treating these calculators as a “black box.” If you don’t understand the underlying setback principles, you won’t know when the software is giving you a bad result. For instance, if the software defaults to a K-factor of 0.5 but you are bending a very hard material that doesn’t stretch much, the resulting flat pattern will be wrong.
A competent engineer should be able to perform a “sanity check” with a manual calculation. By knowing the $\tan(A/2) \cdot (R+T)$ formula, you can quickly verify if the CAD system’s flat pattern makes sense.
When you have multiple bends meeting at a single corner—a “three-way corner”—setback becomes a 3D problem. You have to calculate the setback for each plane to determine the “corner relief.” This is the hole or cutout you see at the intersection of bends in a flat pattern. This relief is designed to prevent the material from bunching up or tearing at the tangent points. The size and shape of that relief are directly dictated by the setback of the intersecting bends.
Even with the best math, things can go wrong. Here are the most frequent setback-related issues encountered in manufacturing:
Confusing Bend Angle with Included Angle: Always double-check which angle your formula requires. If you are bending a part 30 degrees from flat, your bend angle is 30. If you use the included angle of 150, your setback calculation will be massive and wrong.
Ignoring Material Thickness Variation: Sheet metal is sold with a thickness tolerance. “10-gauge” steel can vary by several thousandths of an inch. For high-precision work, measure the actual sheet with calipers and use that value for your setback calculation ($T$).
Tooling Mismatch: As mentioned before, the “theoretical” radius on the print must match the “actual” radius produced by the die. If the shop floor changes the die size, the setback must be recalculated.
Incorrect Mold Point Identification: In complex parts with non-parallel flanges, finding the mold point can be tricky. Use construction lines in your CAD sketch to ensure you are measuring from the correct intersection.
As we move toward Industry 4.0, the way we handle setback is evolving. We are seeing the rise of “intelligent” press brakes equipped with laser angle-measuring systems. These machines measure the bend in real-time, calculate the springback, and adjust the stroke on the fly.
Some of these systems can even feed data back to the engineering department. If the machine detects that the material is consistently resulting in a 2.2mm radius instead of a 2.0mm radius, the software can automatically update the setback values for the next batch of flat patterns. This creates a closed-loop system that minimizes waste and maximizes precision.
Setback is far more than just a math problem; it is the fundamental language of sheet metal fabrication. It represents the space where the abstract geometry of a design meets the physical resistance of the material. By mastering the calculation of Outside Setback and understanding its relationship with the mold point, tangent point, and bend deduction, manufacturing engineers can transform the unpredictability of the shop floor into a precise, repeatable process.
Whether you are working on a simple bracket or a complex aerospace assembly, the principles remain the same. Respect the radius, account for the thickness, and always remember that the metal has a mind of its own. When you account for setback correctly, parts fit, assemblies slide together perfectly, and the “scrap bin” stays empty. In the competitive landscape of modern manufacturing, that level of precision is not just an advantage—it is a necessity.