Content Menu
● Testing PEEK’s Heat Resistance
● Q&A
Polyether ether ketone, or PEEK, is a standout in the world of high-performance plastics. Engineers prize it for its strength, resistance to harsh chemicals, and ability to hold up under scorching temperatures. You’ll find it in everything from jet engine parts to surgical implants, where failure isn’t an option. But here’s the big question: can PEEK handle being cooked at 200°C day in and day out? That’s a make-or-break point for many materials, and it’s critical for folks designing parts in fields like aerospace, cars, or medical devices.
This article is a deep dive into whether PEEK can take the heat—literally. We’ll unpack its makeup, how it’s tested, and what happens when it’s pushed to 200°C for long stretches. Expect real-world stories, hard data from lab tests, and practical tips for using PEEK in prototypes. I’ve leaned on solid research from places like Semantic Scholar and Google Scholar, steering clear of anything that feels like AI fluff. My goal is to keep this conversational, like we’re chatting over coffee, but packed with the kind of detail a manufacturing engineer needs to make smart choices.
We’ll start with what makes PEEK special, then look at how it’s tested for heat resistance, and wrap up with real examples of it in action. By the end, you’ll have a clear picture of whether PEEK is your go-to for high-heat prototyping—and what to watch out for.
PEEK is part of a fancy family called polyaryletherketones, or PAEKs. Its backbone is a chain of ketone and ether bonds hooked to aromatic rings, which sounds like chemistry jargon but basically means it’s built to last. This structure makes PEEK semi-crystalline—think of it as having organized patches that give it a melting point around 343°C and a glass transition temperature (where it starts getting softer) at about 143°C. That’s way higher than everyday plastics like the polyethylene in your grocery bags.
Mechanically, PEEK is a beast. It has a tensile strength of 90–100 MPa, meaning it can take a lot of pulling before it snaps, and a stiffness (Young’s modulus) of 3.6 GPa, putting it in the same league as some lightweight metals. It doesn’t conduct heat well, which is handy in hot environments, and it laughs off most chemicals—though concentrated sulfuric acid can mess it up. In aerospace, it’s used for brackets that need to be light but tough. In hospitals, it’s shaped into spinal implants because it’s safe for the body and doesn’t show up on X-rays.
PEEK is a dream for prototyping because it’s so versatile. You can injection-mold it for precise parts, extrude it into rods for machining, or even 3D-print it with fused deposition modeling (FDM) for complex shapes. For example, aerospace shops often turn extruded PEEK rods into custom fittings. A study on 3D-printed PEEK found that parts made with FDM hit a yield strength of 98.3 MPa—65% better than extruded versions—showing how the way you process it matters.
You can also beef up PEEK with additives. Toss in carbon fibers, and you get CF/PEEK, which can hit tensile strengths of 995 MPa under the right conditions, like printing in a vacuum with infrared preheating. That’s why it’s a favorite for parts that need to act like metal but weigh less.

Running at 200°C nonstop is brutal for most plastics. They’ll soften, break down, or just give up. PEEK’s specs claim it can handle up to 250°C continuously, but 200°C is a practical test point for real-world use. How long it’s exposed, what kind of stress it’s under, and whether there’s oxygen around all play a role. To figure out if PEEK can hack it, researchers put it through a battery of tests to see how it holds up.
Here’s how scientists poke and prod PEEK to test its mettle at high heat:
These tests paint a picture: plain PEEK can handle 200°C with little trouble, and reinforced versions are even tougher.
In jet engines, PEEK brackets face temps up to 200°C while holding heavy loads. A study on 3D-printed PEEK parts, made at a nozzle temp of 420°C, showed they hit 34.81% crystallinity and a yield strength of 98.3 MPa. These brackets swapped out aluminum, cutting weight by 30% without losing strength.
PEEK’s a star in medical implants like spinal cages, which need to survive sterilization at 200°C. Research showed PEEK keeps its stiffness (4.21 GPa) and shear strength (1.52 GPa) during short bursts at 200°C. Carbon fiber PEEK implants hit a stiffness of 15.1 GPa, perfect for supporting spines.
Under car hoods, PEEK seals and manifolds deal with 200°C daily. A test on CF/PEEK cylinders at 170°C found carbon fibers cut strength loss by 75% compared to plain PEEK, proving additives make a big difference in heat resistance.
At 200°C, PEEK is above its glass transition (143°C), so it’s less rigid and more pliable. Tests at 170°C showed its stiffness drops, but it stretches more (22.86% elongation at break), meaning it’s less likely to snap under strain. Creep—slow deformation under load—is a worry at this temp. One study found creep picks up above 143°C, but CF/PEEK keeps it in check thanks to the fibers holding things together.
PEEK doesn’t start falling apart until well above 400°C, according to TGA tests. At 200°C, it’s rock-solid in inert settings like nitrogen. In air, oxygen can cause some surface changes, forming a char that actually helps resist fire. A fire study found PEEK forms a graphite-like layer at high heat, keeping it from burning easily.
Crystallinity is key to PEEK’s heat resistance. More crystals mean better strength and stability. 3D-printing at 420°C gave PEEK 34.81% crystallinity, beating extruded parts at 31.55%. Annealing after printing can boost this further, making parts tougher for long-term heat exposure.
Oxygen and water can nudge PEEK’s behavior at 200°C. It’s tough against moisture, but long-term humidity might tweak its surface. In space, where outgassing matters, PEEK passes strict tests, barely releasing gases in a vacuum at 200°C.

For 200°C prototypes, design matters. Thin walls, like in CF/PEEK cylinders, stay stiff at 170°C but need careful shaping to avoid buckling. Topology optimization—used in tiny satellite parts—helps make PEEK parts light yet strong.
3D-printing PEEK with FDM is great for prototypes, but you need the right settings. A 420°C nozzle and 40 mm/s speed improve layer bonding, per one study. Injection molding gives tighter precision for production but costs more. Either way, PEEK holds up at 200°C if processed well.
PEEK isn’t cheap—its complex production drives up prices. For prototypes, plain PEEK often does the job, but critical parts might need CF/PEEK or glass fiber PEEK for extra toughness. In aerospace, the weight savings (like 30% for brackets) can justify the cost over metal.
At 200°C, PEEK creeps more under load, especially without fibers. This limits it in high-stress spots. It’s also less resistant to repeated stress (fatigue) above 143°C, so dynamic parts like engine gears need careful design.
PEEK’s picky about how it’s made. Cool it too fast in 3D-printing, and you get warping, as one study noted. Wrong nozzle temps can lower crystallinity, weakening heat resistance. It takes skill to get it right.
PEEK shrugs off most chemicals, but halogens or strong acids at 200°C can eat away at it. In chemical plants or salty ocean settings, you might need to consider alternatives like PTFE.
A study on PEEK for small satellites showed it handles 200°C in space’s vacuum. 3D-printed parts, designed with topology optimization, kept strength and barely outgassed, making PEEK a lightweight champ for space.
PEEK’s used in dental syringes that get sterilized at 200°C. Tests proved it stays strong and doesn’t degrade in steam, ensuring tools last through repeated use.
PEEK bearings under car hoods run at 200°C with low wear. A study on CF/PEEK found it wears less than plain PEEK, ideal for high-pressure engine parts.
PEEK’s a powerhouse for parts that need to survive 200°C nonstop. Its crystal structure, strong mechanics, and heat resistance make it a top pick for aerospace, medical, and automotive work. Lab tests back this up: plain PEEK holds its own at 200°C, and fiber-reinforced versions are even better under stress. But it’s not perfect—creep, tricky processing, and cost mean you’ve got to plan carefully.
For engineers prototyping high-heat parts, PEEK’s a solid bet. Get the processing right—like hitting 420°C on a 3D-printer—and add fibers for tough jobs, and it’ll perform. Looking ahead, tweaking PEEK to resist creep better or making it cheaper to process could open even more doors. From jet brackets to spinal implants, PEEK’s track record shows it’s not just up to the task—it often steals the show.
Q1: Why’s PEEK good for 200°C round-the-clock use?
It’s got a high melting point (343°C), a crystalline structure, and low heat conduction, so it stays strong and doesn’t degrade at 200°C. Fibers like carbon make it even tougher under stress.
Q2: Does how you make PEEK affect its heat performance?
Big time. 3D-printing at high temps (like 420°C) boosts crystallinity for better heat resistance. Bad cooling can warp parts, so precision’s key.
Q3: What’s PEEK’s downside at 200°C?
It creeps more above 143°C and loses stiffness. Without fibers, heavy loads can deform it over time, and some chemicals can attack it.
Q4: Can PEEK handle 200°C in airy places?
Mostly, yes. Oxygen might change its surface, but it forms a fire-resistant char. Test it for your specific setup, though.
Q5: How’s PEEK stack up against metals for hot prototypes?
It’s lighter and resists corrosion better than metals like aluminum, great for weight-sensitive parts. But it’s pricier and creeps more, so it’s not always the winner.
Investigating the hot isostatic pressing of an additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composite
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering; General Materials Science
Issued: 01/01/2021
Key Findings: Hot isostatic pressing improves mechanical properties and thermal stability of CF-PEEK composites.
Methodology: Additive manufacturing followed by hot isostatic pressing and mechanical testing.
Citation: van de Werken Nekoda et al., 2021, pp. 1-15
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221486042031006X
A Case Study of Polyether Ether Ketone (I): Investigating the Thermal and Fire Behavior of a High-Performance Material
Polymer Degradation and Stability
Published: 2020-08-10
Key Findings: PEEK exhibits excellent charring and fire resistance due to formation of graphite-like char and release of noncombustible gases.
Methodology: Thermogravimetric analysis, pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, cone calorimetry.
Citation: Study on thermal decomposition and fire behavior, 2020, pp. 1375-1394
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32785103/
Multi-scale and multi-technique analysis of the thermal degradation of poly(ether ether ketone)
Polymer Degradation and Stability
Published: 2018
Key Findings: Oxidation leads to crosslinking predominating over chain scission, increasing Tg and affecting mechanical properties; oxidation profiles correlate with crystallinity changes.
Methodology: FTIR spectrophotometry, differential scanning calorimetry, micro-indentation on PEEK films.
Citation: Courvoisier et al., 2018, pp. 120-135
URL: https://sam.ensam.eu/handle/10985/13280
Polyether ether ketone (PEEK)
Thermal degradation of polymers