Content Menu
● Fluidity Fundamentals in Aluminium Die Casting Alloys
● Practical Composition Windows
● Testing Protocols That Catch Problems Early
● Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Die casting remains one of the most efficient ways to produce complex, thin-walled, high-volume metal components. The process depends heavily on the molten alloy filling the die completely in a fraction of a second under high pressure, then solidifying into a part that meets mechanical requirements throughout its service life. The central challenge is that the same elements that improve flow often reduce strength or ductility, while those that increase strength frequently harm castability. Finding the workable middle ground determines whether a component passes validation, survives warranty, and keeps production costs under control.
Aluminium-silicon alloys continue to dominate high-pressure die casting because silicon dramatically lowers melting temperature and viscosity. Most commercial die casting alloys fall between 7 % and 12 % Si, with copper, magnesium, iron, and manganese added in controlled amounts. Small changes—sometimes as little as 0.3 % of an element—shift the balance between fluidity length in a spiral test and tensile elongation measured on a separately cast test bar. The goal is a composition that fills 0.6 mm walls without misruns and still delivers 180–250 MPa yield strength and at least 3–5 % elongation after heat treatment when required.
The following sections examine the individual contributions of major and minor elements, review practical limits observed in production, and show how foundries have adjusted compositions for specific applications ranging from transmission cases to battery housings.
Fluidity is measured in practice by the distance molten metal travels in a standardised channel before freezing. Common tests include the vacuum fluidity spiral, the Archimedean spiral, and simple strip channels. Results correlate well with the ability to fill thin sections and sharp corners in real dies.
Silicon is the primary fluidity promoter. Raising silicon from 7 % to 11 % typically increases spiral length by 40–60 % at the same superheat because the eutectic temperature drops from about 610 °C to 577 °C and latent heat is released over a narrower interval. Beyond 12 % Si, gains diminish and primary silicon particles begin to raise viscosity again.
Copper and magnesium have opposite effects. Each 1 % Cu added shortens fluidity length by roughly 8–12 % because the freezing range widens from ~50 °C to over 100 °C, encouraging early dendrite formation that blocks narrow channels. Magnesium behaves similarly but to a lesser extent. Iron, when it forms long β-Al5FeSi needles, acts as a strong flow obstacle; keeping iron below 0.8 % and converting the remainder to α-phase with manganese is standard practice.
Temperature compensates for composition shortfalls, but every extra 20 °C above 680 °C increases die soldering risk and energy cost. Modern foundries therefore prefer compositional solutions over higher melt temperatures.
Ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation in die castings come from solid-solution strengthening, precipitation hardening, and eutectic silicon morphology.
Copper dissolves in the aluminium matrix during solution treatment and precipitates as Al2Cu during aging, raising yield strength from ~140 MPa (as-cast) to 240–280 MPa in T6 or T7 condition. Magnesium forms Mg2Si, which is particularly effective in alloys with Si > 7 %. A shift from 0.3 % to 0.6 % Mg can increase hardness by 20–30 BHN.
Eutectic silicon plates act as internal notches in unmodified alloys, limiting elongation to 1–2 %. Adding 100–250 ppm strontium or sodium converts the plate-like morphology to fine fibrous or coral-like structures, routinely raising elongation to 5–8 % without hurting fluidity.
Grain refinement with Ti-B master alloys reduces dendrite arm spacing and improves feeding, adding another 15–25 MPa to yield strength. The effect is most pronounced in low-alloy Al-Si7Mg variants used for structural castings.
Production experience and published work have narrowed the useful composition ranges:
Small but deliberate deviations inside specification limits often yield the biggest gains. One transmission maker moved Si from 8.8 % to 9.4 % and Cu from 3.2 % to 2.7 % in A380, gaining 80 mm spiral length and 3 % elongation while keeping strength unchanged.
A European gearbox manufacturer cast housings in modified AlSi9Cu3. Original composition gave frequent cold shuts on 1.2 mm ribs. Raising melt temperature helped but increased soldering. Instead, they lowered Cu to 2.6 % and added 180 ppm Sr. Spiral length increased from 420 mm to 580 mm at the same 680 °C, ribs filled cleanly, and elongation rose from 2.1 % to 4.8 %. Scrap rate fell from 6.8 % to 1.9 %.
A North American EV platform switched battery trays from extruded 6xxx to die-cast AlSi10Mg. Initial trials with 0.45 % Mg showed 9 % elongation but occasional misruns in 2 mm cooling channels. Reducing Mg to 0.35 % and adding 0.05 % Ti restored complete fill while retaining 7 % elongation and 215 MPa yield strength.
An Asian telecom equipment supplier produces heat-sink bases with fins 0.4 mm thick. They run a low-iron AlSi12(Fe) variant at 11.8 % Si and 720 °C. Any copper above 0.1 % caused visible shortening of the fins; strict Cu control below 0.05 % keeps fluidity consistent across recycled heats.
Most foundries now combine three quick checks before full die trials:
Statistical correlation between these three metrics and actual die fill performance is typically R² > 0.92, allowing reliable prediction from a single ladle sample.
Successful die casting alloys are never the result of picking a single “best” grade from a datasheet. They emerge from systematic adjustment of silicon, copper, magnesium, and minor elements within narrow windows that respect both fluidity requirements and mechanical targets. The difference between chronic misruns and robust fill, or between brittle fracture and acceptable ductility, often lies in changes of 0.2–0.5 % of one element combined with proper modification and melt control.
Modern structural and thin-wall applications have pushed the envelope toward lower copper, higher magnesium, and heavier reliance on strontium refinement, but the classic AlSi9Cu3 family remains dominant where cost and recycling matter most. Whichever base is chosen, the principle stays the same: measure fluidity and mechanical response together, iterate quickly on composition, and lock the specification tightly once the balance is proven on the shop floor.
Q1: Why does copper reduce fluidity so much in die casting alloys?
A: Copper widens the freezing range and promotes early dendrite networks that block narrow channels.
Q2: Is there a safe iron level that does not hurt properties?
A: Below 0.7 % Fe with Mn ≥ 0.3 % usually converts most iron to compact α-phase instead of needles.
Q3: How much strontium is typically needed for good modification?
A: 120–250 ppm, depending on cooling rate and magnesium content; over-addition causes porosity.
Q4: Can recycled material still meet tight composition windows?
A: Yes, with real-time XRF or spark-OES control and corrective additions of pure aluminium or master alloys.
Q5: Which alloy offers the best combination for structural EV parts today?
A: AlSi10Mg-type with low Cu, 0.3–0.4 % Mg, and Sr modification routinely delivers 200–230 MPa yield and 6–10 % elongation.